What now following the cladding amendment (Fire Safety Bill) veto?
cladding-safety

What now following the cladding amendment (Fire Safety Bill) veto?

The Fire Safety Bill was introduced by the Government in March 2020 as a first step towards delivering their commitment towards implementing the Phase One Report of the Grenfell Tower Inquiry recommendations and improving cladding safety.

Between July and October 2020, a 3-month governmental consultation exercise took place, where views were sought on how best to deliver the Inquiry’s recommendations and to strengthen the Fire Safety Order. Over 200 responses were received.

The current position

Under The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 (“the Order”), which brought together several pieces of legislation, those in control of premises (building owners, landlords) are responsible for fire safety and are also under a duty to undertake assessments and manage risks. This is especially relevant to leasehold properties. The legislation applies to all non-domestic premises, including communal areas of residential buildings with multiple homes, such as flats.

What does the Fire Safety Bill do?

The Bill applies to any building containing two or more sets of domestic premises, the building’s structure, its external walls and any common parts, including the front doors of residential areas. It also clarifies that references to “external walls” within the Order include, “doors or windows in those walls” and “anything attached to the exterior of those walls (including balconies)”.

The amendments to the Order aim to increase enforcement action in these areas, and improve safety for leaseholders, particularly where removal and remediation of Aluminium Composite Material (ACM) cladding is not taking place.

It also seeks to impose a public fire safety register that will allow members of the public to access fire risk assessments for all buildings that the Fire Safety Order applies to. This includes residential buildings, schools, hospitals, and prisons.

Does the Bill cover the whole of the UK?

This Bill only applies to England and Wales. Separate fire safety legislation is in place in Northern Ireland and Scotland. Although fire safety is a devolved issue in Wales, the Bill amends the shared legislation with the same powers applying to both English and Welsh Ministers.

Timeline of the Bill

  • 7th September 2020 – Bill passes through the House of Commons stages without amendment
  • 24th November 2020 – House of Lords considers Bill and passes back to House of Commons with five amendments. One of which aims to restrict the passing on of remediation costs to leaseholders. This was supplemented by further proposed amendments in the Commons on the same issue, known as the “McPartland Smith” amendments, relating to ongoing concerns about the cost to leaseholders of removing cladding from high-rise residential buildings and creation of a national public register for fire safety.
  • 24th February 2021 – the House of Commons accepted two amendments, but not other amendments, including the proposal relating to remediation costs.
  • 17th March 2021 – the House of Lords return the Bill to the House of Commons with amendments relating to remediation costs.
  • 22nd March 2021 – the House of Commons veto the amendment by 322 to 253, a majority of 69.

The Bill will now return to the House of Lords for further consideration.

What are MPs objections to the Bill?

The Government believes the amendments are unnecessary because they are already putting in place the building blocks to enshrine the Grenfell Inquiry’s recommendations in law.

Ministers said the amendments would lead to delays in making buildings safe. And although some Conservative MPs backed the amendments, housing minister Christopher Pincher told the House of Commons the proposals were “unworkable and impractical” and went on to say, (the amendments) “will make legislation less clear; they do not reflect the complexity involved in apportioning liability for remedial defects.”

Supporting the amendments, Conservative MP Royston Smith said, “leaseholders were being forced to stump up thousands of pounds to resolve issues that were not their fault.” Going on to say, “in my hand this evening, I have an invoice. It’s an invoice for service charges and remediation of fire safety defects. It is an invoice for nearly £79,000.”

But a Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government spokesperson said, “these amendments would not protect leaseholders from remediation costs as they envisage and would slow down out work to make residents safer in their homes. The Government is bringing forward the biggest improvements to building and fire safety in a generation.”

Regarding the proposed public fire safety register, the Government has raised concerns about the security issues it poses. Believing that if everyone can access this information, then those with malicious intent, such as criminal or terrorists, would have free access to it as well. They have proposed that building owners and/or managers, designated as the “responsible person”, act as gatekeeper. Providing vital fire safety information to residents, including fire safety risk assessments only by request.

What next?

Following the decision on 22nd March 2021 by the House of Commons to vote down an amendment to the Fire Safety Bill, the Government has faced a backlash. MPs voted by 322 votes to 253 (a majority of 69) to veto the House of Lords amendment to the bill which, as discussed, not least aimed to protect leaseholders from having to pay for the removal of cladding by making developers responsible, with the government paying upfront and then recouping the costs from developers.

If the Bill had passed, as a result of its amendments, public and industry bodies expected there to be more enforcement action being taken by Fire and Rescue Authorities, and that it would impose greater burdens on the building owner and/or manager or “responsible person” in multi-occupancy residential buildings.

There has been criticism that the Government is rowing back on its commitment to deliver the Inquiry’s recommendations, and by vetoing the amendments it has failed to act as promised. The Government has hit back, stating it is fully committed to supporting the intention to protect leaseholders from remediation costs but disagrees that the Fire Safety Bill is the right legislation to address this issue.

On 10th February 2021, the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, Robert Jenrick MP, announced a five-point plan to help protect those leaseholders from the cost of replacing unsafe cladding on their homes:

  1. In England the Government will pay for the removal of unsafe cladding for leaseholders in all residential buildings of 18 metres or higher (approximately 6 storeys).
  2. A finance scheme will be set up to provide reassurance for leaseholders in buildings between 11 and 18 metres (between 4 and 6 storeys), ensuring they pay no more than £50 per month for removing cladding through a long-term, low interest, government-backed financing arrangement. This is specifically for lower-rise residential buildings, where the Government believes the safety risk is less than that of higher-rise buildings.
  3. An industry levy and tax to ensure developers play their part. The proposed levy will apply when developers seek permission to develop certain high-rise buildings in England. A new tax will be introduced to the UK residential property market development sector in 2022, which is hoped will raise at least £2billion over the next ten years to help pay for cladding remediation costs.
  4. A new safety regime to ensure a tragedy like Grenfell Tower is never repeated.
  5. Providing confidence to the housing market, including lenders and surveyors, meaning that homeowners prevented from selling or re-mortgaging their homes, through no fault of their own, will now be able to do so.

The fund, which will replace unsafe cladding in residential buildings reaching such a height, will automatically cover all buildings over 18 metres (6 storeys). However, there are concerns that Mr Jenrick’s proposal also fails to cover the multitude of broader fire safety issues exposed in the Grenfell Tower Inquiry, which have been estimated to cost in the region of £15bn.

Cladding campaigners have described the announcement of extra funding and the introduction of a developer’s tax as a “betrayal” of affected leaseholders because it only covers properties over 6 storeys high, forcing those in lower-rise properties to take out loans to cover the cost of removal.

Director of the Leasehold Knowledge Partnership, Sebastian O’Kelly accused the Government of ignoring the financial consequences and risks to homeowners and warned of an immediate crisis in which leaseholders faced with exorbitant removal bills simply won’t be able to pay and are likely to be rendered homeless as a result.

The Fire Safety Bill is the only piece of legislation that the Government has introduced since the Grenfell Tower fire in June 2017. Although in February 2021, policing minister Kit Malthouse told Parliament the Building Safety Bill set to be introduced in the Spring (still awaited at the time of writing), “is the appropriate legislative mechanism for addressing these issues.” The Building Safety Bill intends to deliver wholesale reforms to the regulatory framework surrounding residential building safety, although it is now April, and whether this piece of legislation will make an appearance any time soon, remains to be seen.

What our clients say

Great value for money. Everything went smoothly and I was very pleased with the service provided
Rachel Whitfield
Rachel Whitfield
20:59 12 Oct 18
Excellent! Very responsive, and really helped to push the purchase. There were unexpected delays during the process, but Anthony really helped to reassure me that he was doing everything he could to progress the sale. Ultimately, it all worked out in the end, and I would highly recommend! I would also recommend for auction purposes.
Sean Stevens
Sean Stevens
09:14 21 May 18
Very happy customer. Understanding of our needs and recommended a really fantastic solicitor.
Jack Hearne
Jack Hearne
17:49 12 Oct 18
I have just completed the purchase of my flat with them. They were recommend by the estates agents Phillip Arnold and they were fantastic. My case was handled by Milena who was really helpful and always available on the phone. The online system is also really easy to use. If I buy or sell a property I will definitely be using them again.
Sharon Kelly
Sharon Kelly
18:27 20 Dec 17
I used this service following a recommendation. The online case tracker worked really well. I would recommend this service as it's vital in the coordination between Estate Agencies and between Solicitors. The service proved invaluable in helping progress the conveyancing work efficiently and effectively. Completed the transaction just before Christmas having instructed the Solicitors on the 4th.
Shelly Harrill
Shelly Harrill
16:30 19 Dec 17
Excellent Service. Final Price same as quoted.
A Google User
A Google User
14:26 19 Dec 18
Have used them twice. Both times completion happened in less than 4 weeks, even over Xmas! Totally amazing. They take the stress out of the whole process.
Daniel West
Daniel West
13:04 21 Dec 18
Excellent Service. Final Price same as quoted
Parsa Khamooshi
Parsa Khamooshi
15:54 21 Dec 18
Being a first time buyer they guided me smoothly through the whole process of moving into my first home. Very professional and economical.
Uday Seth
Uday Seth
12:31 24 Dec 18
Express Conveyancing have been excellent in the handling of my recent house sale and purchase. Would highly recommend
James Ellis
James Ellis
11:43 30 Apr 19
Express Conveyancing have been excellent in the handling of my recent house sale and purchase. Would highly recommend
Michelle Preston
Michelle Preston
12:20 30 Apr 19
ThanksThanks for handling my sale and purchase. No complaints from me. Rebecca was regularly on hand to help with my queries and deal with issues.
Claire Miles
Claire Miles
17:48 07 May 19
I bought my first home in South London with Express Conveyancing . Great professional service, I was regularly updated and looked after. Top marks, 100% recommendation from me!
Dale Griffiths
Dale Griffiths
15:58 02 May 19
Good service and happy with the conveyancer
Chris Jenkins
Chris Jenkins
22:01 17 May 19
Great service from start to finish. Was great being able to see progress online! Very quick and efficient! All staff were helpful. Highly recommend
Reece Moseley
Reece Moseley
06:20 30 May 19
I would highly recommend them. They deal with any queries promptly and efficiently. Would definitely use them again.
Sahar Dalini
Sahar Dalini
09:13 10 Jun 19
Fair prices good efficient service
Sue Batchelor
Sue Batchelor
18:46 01 Jun 19
I would highly recommend them. They deal with any queries promptly and efficiently. Would definitely use them again.
Sahar Dalini
Sahar Dalini
09:14 10 Jun 19
This company does not provide conveyancing services directly, they are an introductory company, paid by solicitors to get clients for them. Once you engage with a conveyancing solicitor suggested by them, they don't interfere, and how quick or slow the process is depends on that solicitor that paid them to recruit you. In our case the solicitor was pleasant and corteous, but a bit relaxed, and the whole process took about 9 weeks - about average, but there was nothing "express" about it.About the app to track progress, it is updated by the conveyancing solicitor, so its its usefulness depends on how much he engages with it. In our case, not so much.
Pedro Silva
Pedro Silva
18:27 02 Oct 19
Absolutely outstanding service provided by Rebecca. She really got things moving when they came to a halt. I was moved within 9 weeks. If it wasn't for Rebecca, the move wouldnt have happened that quick. Definitely use EC again in the future.
Sara Kawsar
Sara Kawsar
11:35 03 Oct 19
we purchased a new build flat. The staff at Express were very helpful in finding us our solicitors who was great.
Carl Devenport
Carl Devenport
14:48 26 Sep 19
great service. Completed quickly as promised
Mark Slavinski
Mark Slavinski
16:52 24 Sep 19
Was looking for a modern solicitor with an online website status page so you can live track your progress. The service was fast and they assigned us with a solicitor firm, which was very fast, efficient and pleasant to deal with. HIGHLY RECOMMENDED
Cedric Tomas
Cedric Tomas
21:29 13 Mar 20
Express provided me with an excellent firm (WYM Legal) and had a good portal for keeping me updated during the process. The portal did lack detail but nonetheless meant slightly less chasing.
Sarju Shah
Sarju Shah
10:50 11 Apr 20
From the quote stage all the way through to completion, this was a very straight forward and open process. Express Conveyancing provided a very quick and detailed quote, which was competitive and their partner PCS delivered the service you’d like to expect from a conveyancing firm. Very happy with the service and would definitely use again.
Harry Edwards
Harry Edwards
20:33 11 Mar 21
I always received update on time, they are very good at calling back. I completed my purchase just under 10 weeks. I am very pleases with service and fee. I definitely recommend the Express Conveyancing to my friends.
Bikash Limbu
Bikash Limbu
14:42 12 Jan 21
I needed to get an auction legal pack reviewed at short notice. Rebecca and her team were super fast AND thorough in their review, identifying areas of concern and helping me get the seller to correct issues with the auction legal pack. Fast, complete and clear responses on all my multiple communications. Super service.
Tracey Lall
Tracey Lall
11:02 08 Oct 20
I decided to appoint Express Conveyancing as the reviews were good and the prices were very reasonable. Rebecca Purssord was attentive and professional throughout. Despite the effects of Covid-19, Rebecca remained available and was very helpful at all times. I would not hesitate to recommend them.
michael lewis mcrae
michael lewis mcrae
16:48 01 Jul 20

Our News

× Whatsapp Us