Has the ruling of T W Logistics Ltd -v- Essex County Council and Ian Tucker by the Supreme Court left uncertainties?
village-green-ruling

Has the ruling of T W Logistics Ltd -v- Essex County Council and Ian Tucker by the Supreme Court left uncertainties?

The Supreme Court handed down their ruling on 21st February 2021, which has wide implications for the status of privately owned land classified as a town or village green. The term ‘village green’ conjures up a beautiful area where locals walk their dogs and its children play, however this case was unusual in that it concerned an area of land in a working commercial port.

The land, lying along the quayside in Mistley port in Essex, was owned and operated by the Appellant (T W Logistics). It had been using the land for port vehicles, including heavy goods vehicles, and the temporary storage of cargo. However, the locals also used the land to walk dogs, and for general recreation – the two competing sets of activities co-existing for many years.

In September 2008, following a threat by the Health & Safety Executive and concerns about people falling into the water, the Appellant erected a 1.8-metre-high metal fence along the quayside. Two years’ later, Ian Tucker (the Respondent) on 18th August 2010, applied to Essex County Council to register a large portion of the quay as a town or village green (TVG) and in 2013, the Council appointed an Inspector. Whilst excluding several parts of the quay from the application, they found that the land satisfied the statutory criteria that: “it had been used ‘as of right’ for lawful sports and pastimes by significant numbers of local inhabitants for the preceding 20 years.” Essex council duly registered the land as a TVG.

The Appellant challenged the registration in the High Court on the grounds that registration could criminalise its commercial activities and that the recreational use of the land was not “as of right”, however all grounds of appeal were dismissed, which was subsequently upheld by the Court of Appeal. There then followed a further appeal by the landowner to the Supreme Court against the registration of the land, but it was rejected in its entirety.

In Judgment, the Justices ruled that registration of the land did not criminalise the Appellant’s pre-existing commercial activities, noting that local people “have to exercise their rights over a TVG in a fair and reasonable way, so as to respect the concurrent reasonable and established use by the landowner. This has become known as the principle of ‘give and take’”. The landowner could therefore continue to use the land for its commercial enterprise, providing it did not interfere with the right of the public to use the land.

What the ruling means in practice

Its immediate impact demands the landowner remove or replace the metal fencing with an alternative allowing residents access to the quayside for the first time since 2008 when it was erected. And highlights that whilst implementing health and safety preventative measures, the landowner also needs to consider the type of land they are protecting. All businesses have a duty to consider and manage risks on their land, but must also take into consideration if it obstructs access to the use of the land. The court said the landowner should have considered:

  • Opening dialogue with the locals about the type of safety and/or preventative measures that could have been taken
  • Liaised with campaigners to remove the fencing for a suggested ‘environmentally and aesthetically acceptable form of safety barrier along the quay edge.’

The decision attempts to reconcile a landowner’s legitimate use of land with local inhabitants’ recreational rights. It also highlights the risks to landowners of registration which, arguably if successful, may significantly reduce the value of the land.

The decision also challenges the view of what amounts to a TVG. Traditionally, TVG’s are seen as chocolate-box style village greens. However, the land subject to this case was a 200sq m area of concrete in a working port, with HGV’s coming and going. When determining whether land is a TVG, it appears to be important to understand how the land is used, as opposed to what it looks like. This will particularly interest property developers in understanding the changing landscape of how TVG’s may be seen in light of brownfield sites they may have acquired. Although, amendments made to the law in England in 2013, and Wales in 2018, rule out many TVG applications.

It is important to note that the right to make a registration application for a TVG is suspended once a ‘trigger event’ has occurred in relation to the land. Trigger events include first publication of a planning permission application, where development or neighbourhood plans (or a draft of either) identify land for potential development, and the plan has been published or adopted. Although it is important to note, it is still open to residents and pressure groups to object to the adoption of development plans and neighbourhood plans through the planning process.

When can land be registered as a TVG?

TVG’s can be owned by private individuals and businesses or organisations as well as public bodies. Land can be registered as a TVG if local people have used it for sporting recreation and pastimes openly and without the permission of the landowner for at least 20 years.

But who has the right to enjoy, and what constitutes, lawful sports and pastimes?

It does not extend to wider society and is only exercisable by inhabitants of the locality in which the TVG is situated. However, identifying the relevant locality can be difficult in practice. Lawful sports and pastimes are not limited to those activities being enjoyed during the period of use immediately preceding registration. However, where this cannot be determined, it is left for the court to decide the lawfulness of an activity. Although the view of DEFRA is that where an activity is deemed to be a public nuisance under section 29 of the Commons Act 1876, it is unlikely to be considered lawful.

Any right can be exercised free of charge, meaning an owner cannot charge people for using the land in question, and even in cases where the owners ask a local for a donation for its use, they are under no obligation to pay it. This would also apply to a request for a contribution towards maintenance, including hosting an organised event such as a fete or sports match on the land.

Can a green be de-registered?

An owner of a TVG can apply to the Secretary of State under section 16 of the Commons Act 1876, for the land to be released from registration and if successful would result in the land no longer being granted the protection of a TVG. If the ‘release land’ is over 200sqm, an application must be made to register ‘replacement land’ as a TVG in its place. If the release land is smaller than 200sqm, a proposal for replacement land may be included, but there is no mandatory requirement to do so. Although the Secretary of State generally expects that land will be offered in exchange even when not mandated.

This case is a reminder to anyone owning land which is also being used by the public to make sure that its use is only with permission of the landowner. Otherwise, there may be serious consequences for how the land is used in the future. Recent case law confirms that if a landowner does not permit the use of the land by the public, erecting clearly visible signs can deal with the issue effectively and will usually be enough to prevent the use of others’ being ‘as of right’.

 

 

 

What our clients say

Great value for money. Everything went smoothly and I was very pleased with the service provided
Rachel Whitfield
Rachel Whitfield
20:59 12 Oct 18
Excellent! Very responsive, and really helped to push the purchase. There were unexpected delays during the process, but Anthony really helped to reassure me that he was doing everything he could to progress the sale. Ultimately, it all worked out in the end, and I would highly recommend! I would also recommend for auction purposes.
Sean Stevens
Sean Stevens
09:14 21 May 18
Very happy customer. Understanding of our needs and recommended a really fantastic solicitor.
Jack Hearne
Jack Hearne
17:49 12 Oct 18
I have just completed the purchase of my flat with them. They were recommend by the estates agents Phillip Arnold and they were fantastic. My case was handled by Milena who was really helpful and always available on the phone. The online system is also really easy to use. If I buy or sell a property I will definitely be using them again.
Sharon Kelly
Sharon Kelly
18:27 20 Dec 17
I used this service following a recommendation. The online case tracker worked really well. I would recommend this service as it's vital in the coordination between Estate Agencies and between Solicitors. The service proved invaluable in helping progress the conveyancing work efficiently and effectively. Completed the transaction just before Christmas having instructed the Solicitors on the 4th.
Shelly Harrill
Shelly Harrill
16:30 19 Dec 17
Excellent Service. Final Price same as quoted.
A Google User
A Google User
14:26 19 Dec 18
Have used them twice. Both times completion happened in less than 4 weeks, even over Xmas! Totally amazing. They take the stress out of the whole process.
Daniel West
Daniel West
13:04 21 Dec 18
Excellent Service. Final Price same as quoted
Parsa Khamooshi
Parsa Khamooshi
15:54 21 Dec 18
Being a first time buyer they guided me smoothly through the whole process of moving into my first home. Very professional and economical.
Uday Seth
Uday Seth
12:31 24 Dec 18
Express Conveyancing have been excellent in the handling of my recent house sale and purchase. Would highly recommend
James Ellis
James Ellis
11:43 30 Apr 19
Express Conveyancing have been excellent in the handling of my recent house sale and purchase. Would highly recommend
Michelle Preston
Michelle Preston
12:20 30 Apr 19
ThanksThanks for handling my sale and purchase. No complaints from me. Rebecca was regularly on hand to help with my queries and deal with issues.
Claire Miles
Claire Miles
17:48 07 May 19
I bought my first home in South London with Express Conveyancing . Great professional service, I was regularly updated and looked after. Top marks, 100% recommendation from me!
Dale Griffiths
Dale Griffiths
15:58 02 May 19
Good service and happy with the conveyancer
Chris Jenkins
Chris Jenkins
22:01 17 May 19
Great service from start to finish. Was great being able to see progress online! Very quick and efficient! All staff were helpful. Highly recommend
Reece Moseley
Reece Moseley
06:20 30 May 19
I would highly recommend them. They deal with any queries promptly and efficiently. Would definitely use them again.
Sahar Dalini
Sahar Dalini
09:13 10 Jun 19
Fair prices good efficient service
Sue Batchelor
Sue Batchelor
18:46 01 Jun 19
I would highly recommend them. They deal with any queries promptly and efficiently. Would definitely use them again.
Sahar Dalini
Sahar Dalini
09:14 10 Jun 19
This company does not provide conveyancing services directly, they are an introductory company, paid by solicitors to get clients for them. Once you engage with a conveyancing solicitor suggested by them, they don't interfere, and how quick or slow the process is depends on that solicitor that paid them to recruit you. In our case the solicitor was pleasant and corteous, but a bit relaxed, and the whole process took about 9 weeks - about average, but there was nothing "express" about it.About the app to track progress, it is updated by the conveyancing solicitor, so its its usefulness depends on how much he engages with it. In our case, not so much.
Pedro Silva
Pedro Silva
18:27 02 Oct 19
Absolutely outstanding service provided by Rebecca. She really got things moving when they came to a halt. I was moved within 9 weeks. If it wasn't for Rebecca, the move wouldnt have happened that quick. Definitely use EC again in the future.
Sara Kawsar
Sara Kawsar
11:35 03 Oct 19
we purchased a new build flat. The staff at Express were very helpful in finding us our solicitors who was great.
Carl Devenport
Carl Devenport
14:48 26 Sep 19
great service. Completed quickly as promised
Mark Slavinski
Mark Slavinski
16:52 24 Sep 19
Was looking for a modern solicitor with an online website status page so you can live track your progress. The service was fast and they assigned us with a solicitor firm, which was very fast, efficient and pleasant to deal with. HIGHLY RECOMMENDED
Cedric Tomas
Cedric Tomas
21:29 13 Mar 20
Express provided me with an excellent firm (WYM Legal) and had a good portal for keeping me updated during the process. The portal did lack detail but nonetheless meant slightly less chasing.
Sarju Shah
Sarju Shah
10:50 11 Apr 20
From the quote stage all the way through to completion, this was a very straight forward and open process. Express Conveyancing provided a very quick and detailed quote, which was competitive and their partner PCS delivered the service you’d like to expect from a conveyancing firm. Very happy with the service and would definitely use again.
Harry Edwards
Harry Edwards
20:33 11 Mar 21
I always received update on time, they are very good at calling back. I completed my purchase just under 10 weeks. I am very pleases with service and fee. I definitely recommend the Express Conveyancing to my friends.
Bikash Limbu
Bikash Limbu
14:42 12 Jan 21
I needed to get an auction legal pack reviewed at short notice. Rebecca and her team were super fast AND thorough in their review, identifying areas of concern and helping me get the seller to correct issues with the auction legal pack. Fast, complete and clear responses on all my multiple communications. Super service.
Tracey Lall
Tracey Lall
11:02 08 Oct 20
I decided to appoint Express Conveyancing as the reviews were good and the prices were very reasonable. Rebecca Purssord was attentive and professional throughout. Despite the effects of Covid-19, Rebecca remained available and was very helpful at all times. I would not hesitate to recommend them.
michael lewis mcrae
michael lewis mcrae
16:48 01 Jul 20

Our News

× Whatsapp Us